時(shí)間：2011-08-31 13:49來源：藍(lán)天飛行翻譯 作者：航空 點(diǎn)擊：次
|
5 Only one commentor disagreed wholly with the proposal. An industry body felt that the definition should take account of who the operator of the aircraft is. If the operator is a civil organisation then even if the operation is on behalf of the police or military, the aircraft remains a civil aircraft. This comment does not take account of the fact that the determination needed is related more to the operation than the aircraft being used; hence the inclusion of the word ‘temporarily’. The proposal was unchanged and is retained; both JAR–OPS and JAR–FCL require a definition prior to the adoption of a future Convention. Proposal 6: Class It is noted that the definition of Class is only required at the time being for FCL, but as it is a word that may be needed elsewhere it has been included in JAR–1. The format is based on that used and agreed following NPA 1–7. The reserved sub-paragraphs are to indicate that we may, in the future, propose texts for use in other contexts. The explanation that it is expected that other JARs will use the term in the future is offered as a reply to those commentors who felt that the term should only be in JAR–FCL. The comment proposing deletion of the term as the requirements for JAR–FCL were not yet clear is rejected on the basis that it is not the place of the definition to contain the requirements, and once in place, they will not affect the definition of what class is. One commentor proposed adding the words ... and training ... to the initial phrase to indicate the link with JAR–OPS. This was agreed in principle, but the WG considered that the link was better established in an IEM. During the review of NPA comments, the text was altered to make it clearer and to make it read more like a definition of what ‘class’ is, rather than an explanation of a JAR–FCL requirement. A proposed improvement was adopted to indicate that class is only a term used when referring to a group of single-pilot aeroplanes. This required that the term be modified to delete ‘crew complement’. |
